Connect. Secure. Manage.
Nexus Dashboard Orchestration
Plan supported multi-fabric orchestration through Nexus Dashboard, setting policy boundaries and validating inter-fabric connectivity before wider rollout.
Devices supported
across the UK
Client locations
supported
Traffic handled
at peak time
Average
response time
Average response is not a resolution time or a contractual guarantee. Support scope and response commitments are agreed for each engagement.
Nexus Dashboard orchestration coordinates supported tasks across data-centre fabrics. A single change may affect several sites, so its scope must be clear. We plan the approvals, tests and recovery steps for each workflow. The design uses features available in your release and sets limits on what shared control can change.
Workload-led design
Start with application, compute and storage dependencies rather than the switch model.
Clear failure domains
Understand which links, devices and sites can fail together.
Operational clarity
Make fabrics, external routing and management responsibilities supportable.
Identify which tasks should be coordinated
We start with the customer’s operating needs. The aim may be consistent policy across sites, a repeatable service rollout or a controlled way to manage related fabrics. We check what genuinely needs central coordination and what should remain local. Unnecessary coupling can enlarge the impact of an error without improving the app service.
The assessment includes current tools, fabric types, software versions and admin boundaries. Supported integrations are checked for the exact setup. We record which platform is authoritative for each setup area and how local exceptions are approved. This prevents orchestration from becoming another layer that conflicts with current controllers, scripts or manual engineering processes.
Standards & partnerships
Confidence in the team behind your network.
Cyber Essentials
Cyber Essentials PlusMCI Network Services is operated by Proxar Ltd. Certifications apply to the certified legal entity and the scope of its certificates. View accreditation information
Define the policy and ownership model
Shared objects and site-specific values need clear meaning. We agree naming, allocation and review standards with the teams responsible for the apps and fabrics. A common template should not silently imply that every location has identical topology, capacity or external network access. Differences are represented deliberately and remain visible during change review.
The design also defines who can propose, approve and execute a coordinated action. Permissions reflect the possible impact across sites, not merely the convenience of using one admin account. Service credentials are protected and scoped according to supported capabilities. Audit records should identify both the person approving the work and the system performing the technical action.
A useful starting point
Not sure where to start?
Bring the requirement. We will help you define the engineering work.
Check inter-fabric and transport dependencies
Orchestration does not remove the need for a correctly designed inter-site network. We review the routing, MTU, capacity and security prerequisites for the services being coordinated. The external transport may be operated by another team or provider, and its availability needs its own monitoring and escalation path.
Application dependencies are considered alongside network policy. A service deployed consistently at two sites may still rely on one identity system, firewall or data source. We identify those limits so that management consistency is not mistaken for complete app resilience. The design states which outcomes are delivered by orchestration and which require separate infrastructure or app work.
Different environments. The same care.
Built around the work
your network supports.
Finance, banking and the wider private sector. We start with the systems and people that depend on your connections.
Finance & banking
Market-data paths, routing and provider coordination on clients’ behalf.
Financial-market services ↗Offices & multi-site teams
Reliable access between people, workplaces and business applications.
Office network design ↗Data centres & cloud
Network boundaries, workload connections and operational ownership.
Data centre networks ↗Plan for partial execution and conflicting state
A coordinated task can fail after changing only part of the estate. We set out how the workflow detects that state, stops further changes and presents evidence to an engineer. The recovery method must suit the actual operation. An automatic reverse action is not always safe once other systems have responded to the first change.
We also examine drift and concurrent changes. A local engineer or another tool may alter a device between planning and execution. The process should detect relevant differences and require review rather than applying an outdated plan blindly. These controls are tested in a bounded setup where practical, because successful execution under ideal conditions does not prove safe behaviour during a fault.
Validate a limited end-to-end workflow
The pilot uses a representative but controlled task. We check target choice, approvals, changes to the settings, audit records and the resulting network service. Application or tenant reachability is checked where it forms part of the need. A workflow status marked complete is not enough if the intended traffic path or isolation has not been shown.
Failure and recovery scenarios are included according to the risk. We record unsupported conditions and the actions requiring manual intervention. The operating team should know when to retry, when to investigate and when a partially applied change needs a coordinated recovery. This prevents automation from repeating an unsafe action merely because the first attempt did not return a clean success response.
Hand over sustainable orchestration governance
The deliverable includes workflow definitions, ownership, credentials procedures, exception handling and the compatibility assumptions behind them. Changes to platform or fabric releases trigger review. Retired sites and services are removed from targets and permissions so that old workflows cannot act on infrastructure they no longer own.
MCI can design a new orchestration process or review an inherited Nexus Dashboard arrangement. Related work includes ACI Multi-Site design and network change automation. Provide the tasks you want to coordinate, the involved fabrics and current approval process to begin. We will define a supported workflow whose boundaries and failure behaviour are understood before it reaches production.
Talk to a specialist
What does your network need next?
Tell us what you are planning, changing or trying to improve. We will help define a practical next step and the engineering scope.
+44 203 196 6566Choose option 1
sales@proxar.co.ukUK-wide service.
Most of our engineers are based in Kent, with a focus on London, Sussex, Essex and Berkshire.
Existing customers should use their agreed support and escalation channels. This form is for service enquiries, not a monitored emergency ticket.
Tell us what you need.
A short outline is enough. Please do not include passwords or sensitive network details.
Thank you. Your enquiry has been submitted.
Please check your name, email and message, then try again.
Your form session expired. Please try again.
Please wait a minute before sending another enquiry.
We could not submit your enquiry. Please call or email us instead.