Cisco & Meraki specialists. Across the UK.
+44 203 196 6566 · option 1sales@proxar.co.uk

Connect. Secure. Manage.

Catalyst SD-WAN Segmentation

Design segmented Catalyst SD-WAN connectivity with explicit route sharing, shared-service access and security boundaries between business areas.

Cisco Partner since 2009 Projects & ongoing support

Illustrative enterprise Cisco network rack in a modern office environment
Your network. Properly considered.Design · Implementation · Support
1,000+

Devices supported
across the UK

20+

Client locations
supported

Nearly 8 Tbps

Traffic handled
at peak time

3 min

Average
response time

Average response is not a resolution time or a contractual guarantee. Support scope and response commitments are agreed for each engagement.

Catalyst SD-WAN segmentation separates traffic belonging to different users, services or business environments across a supported Cisco WAN. The useful result is controlled connectivity between clearly defined segments, not simply a set of different identifiers in the management platform. MCI Network Services designs and implements segmentation with attention to site routing, shared services, security enforcement and the boundaries where the WAN connects to the rest of the organisation.

01

The whole path

Understand how sites, providers, cloud networks and security controls fit together.

02

Resilience that can be tested

Separate a second circuit from genuine end-to-end service resilience.

03

Provider coordination

Keep addressing, routing and escalation ownership clear across organisations.

Define the segments by purpose and ownership

We establish which networks need separation and why. Corporate users, guest access, operational systems and different business entities may have distinct requirements. The segment model should be understandable to application owners and support engineers, with a clear decision process for adding or changing access.

We also identify cases that do not fit a simple site-wide division. One branch may host several trust zones, while a central service may need to serve more than one segment. These requirements are recorded before configuration begins so the design does not rely on broad exceptions introduced during the first application test.

Illustrative Cisco and Meraki network rack in a modern office
01The office network: switching, uplinks and structured cabling.
Cisco PartnerCisco Partner
Cisco MerakiCisco Meraki
ISO 9001Quality management
ISO 27001Information security
Cyber EssentialsCyber Essentials
Cyber Essentials PlusCyber Essentials Plus

MCI Network Services is operated by Proxar Ltd. Certifications apply to the certified legal entity and the scope of its certificates. View accreditation information

Map local networks to the intended WAN context

Segmentation starts at the site interface and gateway, not only inside the overlay. We review VLANs, routing contexts and service-side connections on the WAN edges. The same identifier used at two sites should represent the same intended purpose, while local differences need an explicit mapping and owner.

Addressing is checked at the same time. Overlapping prefixes can be supported in some separated designs, but they complicate shared access, monitoring and troubleshooting. We assess those consequences rather than assuming separate segments make address overlap harmless wherever traffic eventually needs to meet.

Illustrative Cisco and Meraki fibre network rack with structured cabling
02Fibre, switching and the physical path behind the service.

A useful starting point

Not sure where to start?

Bring the requirement. We will help you define the engineering work.

Talk to a specialist

Control route distribution deliberately

The design specifies which routes belong to each segment and where they should be available. We examine central policy and site-side routing together, including default routes and any exchange with existing OSPF, BGP or static domains. A route advertised into the wrong context can undermine the intended separation even when interface assignments appear correct.

Route exchange between segments requires a defined purpose. We identify the exact shared destinations and the enforcement point governing their use. Unrestricted leaking of routes is not treated as a convenient substitute for a shared-services design, because reachability and permission are separate decisions that need to remain visible.

Illustrative Cisco and Meraki network operations centre with monitoring displays
03Visibility, monitoring and operational control.

Place security enforcement at the boundary

Logical separation in the WAN does not automatically enforce every application restriction. Firewalls, access lists or other supported policy mechanisms may govern connections between segments and external services. We map the actual traffic path and verify that it crosses the intended control in both directions.

This includes cloud connections and central hubs. A carefully separated branch design can become unrestricted when all traffic reaches a shared gateway with permissive policy. Our shared services network access work addresses those controlled exceptions and helps distinguish necessary infrastructure access from unintended transit between trust zones.

Illustrative Cisco and Meraki equipment in a modern data-centre aisle
04Resilient infrastructure from rack to service path.

Plan migration and operational exceptions

Introducing segmentation into a live WAN can alter route visibility and application paths. We prepare a staged approach, beginning with a representative site or service group and validating its dependencies. The transition identifies temporary routing and policy arrangements, together with the conditions for removing them.

Rollback considers both the WAN and the local network. Restoring a central policy may not recover an application if its gateway or firewall rule changed during the same window. We document the complete recovery sequence and ensure the teams needed to validate it are available when enforcement is introduced.

Illustrative Cisco and Meraki data-centre network infrastructure
05Network infrastructure designed around the workloads it carries.

Prove isolation as well as connectivity

Acceptance tests include legitimate workflows within each segment and approved shared-service access. They also test representative connections that should remain blocked. Source positions, destinations and the relevant enforcement points are recorded so the results can be repeated after a later change.

We examine failure and restoration where safe, including whether an alternative route preserves the same boundary. A backup path that bypasses inspection may restore connectivity while violating the security design. Any untested scenario or platform limitation is stated explicitly rather than included in a blanket claim of end-to-end isolation.

Illustrative enterprise Cisco network rack in a modern office environment
06Enterprise switching and routing, built to be operated.

Keep the segment model consistent over time

The handover contains the segment register, site mappings, route policies, shared-service exceptions and ownership. New sites and applications should follow that model instead of adding local shortcuts. Monitoring needs enough context to identify which segment is affected when a route or service fails.

MCI can review an existing deployment or implement segmentation within an agreed Catalyst SD-WAN architecture. Share the zones, applications and interconnections you need to control. We can turn those requirements into supported configuration and testable boundaries without implying that a WAN feature alone satisfies every security or compliance obligation of the organisation.

Illustrative Cisco and Meraki network rack in a modern office
07The office network: switching, uplinks and structured cabling.

Technical references

Illustrative Cisco and Meraki fibre network rack with structured cabling
08Fibre, switching and the physical path behind the service.

Talk to a specialist

What does your network need next?

Tell us what you are planning, changing or trying to improve. We will help define a practical next step and the engineering scope.

+44 203 196 6566

Choose option 1

sales@proxar.co.uk

UK-wide service.
Most of our engineers are based in Kent, with a focus on London, Sussex, Essex and Berkshire.

Existing customers should use their agreed support and escalation channels. This form is for service enquiries, not a monitored emergency ticket.

Tell us what you need.

A short outline is enough. Please do not include passwords or sensitive network details.

Thank you. Your enquiry has been submitted.

We’ll use these details to respond to your enquiry. Please leave out passwords and sensitive network information. Read our privacy notice.