Connect. Secure. Manage.
Cisco NETCONF and RESTCONF
Integrate supported Cisco NETCONF and RESTCONF interfaces for structured configuration and retrieval, with model compatibility and access control checked.
Devices supported
across the UK
Client locations
supported
Traffic handled
at peak time
Average
response time
Average response is not a resolution time or a contractual guarantee. Support scope and response commitments are agreed for each engagement.
Cisco NETCONF and RESTCONF let tools read and change supported devices through structured interfaces. We check the data models and how changes are applied on the actual platform. The work defines access rights, ownership of settings and tests for the result. A successful request must still produce the network state you intended.
Useful visibility
Monitor service-relevant conditions rather than collecting alerts without ownership.
Controlled change
Keep maintenance, automation and configuration work reviewable and recoverable.
Clear escalation
Connect incidents to the right engineering, provider and business contacts.
Start with the required data and operation
We identify whether the task reads setup, retrieves live state or changes a particular resource. These are different needs and may use different models or paths. The design records which Cisco platforms and software releases are included, rather than assuming one schema is implemented uniformly across the estate.
The intended result is described independently of the interface. A request to change an interface setting should identify the service effect and approval needed, not merely the API method to call. This keeps engineering intent visible when the rollout is reviewed or transferred to another tool.
Standards & partnerships
Confidence in the team behind your network.
Cisco Partner
Cisco Meraki
Cyber Essentials
Cyber Essentials PlusMCI Network Services is operated by Proxar Ltd. Certifications apply to the certified legal entity and the scope of its certificates. View accreditation information
Verify advertised capabilities and models
NETCONF capabilities, available datastores and YANG model support are checked on the actual platform. Candidate setup, locking and confirmed-commit behaviour must not be assumed simply because NETCONF is enabled. We check the supported combination and document how it affects staging, validation and recovery.
RESTCONF has its own supported resource and HTTP behaviour. It should not be treated as providing every transaction feature available through NETCONF. The integration selects the appropriate method and handles the actual response semantics rather than presenting both protocols as interchangeable wrappers around the same operation.
A useful starting point
Tell us what is happening.
A short description of the problem is enough for an initial discussion.
Protect the management interface
Access is restricted to authorised systems and accounts with the permissions needed for the task. We review authentication, transport protection, management-network reachability and the handling of certificates or host identity. Enabling a structured interface should not create unnecessarily broad exposure of the device’s admin functions.
The automation platform also needs control. Anyone able to alter the client code or its inputs may influence actions performed with the service account’s privileges. We therefore include repository access, secret storage and execution approval in the design, not only the setup on the Cisco device.
Different environments. The same care.
Built around the work
your network supports.
Finance, banking and the wider private sector. We start with the systems and people that depend on your connections.
Finance & banking
Market-data paths, routing and provider coordination on clients’ behalf.
Financial-market services ↗Offices & multi-site teams
Reliable access between people, workplaces and business applications.
Office network design ↗Data centres & cloud
Network boundaries, workload connections and operational ownership.
Data centre networks ↗Make payload scope explicit
Structured setup can still remove or alter more than intended if its operation and target are poorly chosen. We identify whether a request merges, replaces, creates or deletes the relevant data and test that behaviour on representative settings. The integration should own a defined subset of settings rather than implicitly taking over an entire container.
Model revisions and defaults can affect comparison and validation. A value omitted from a response may not mean the same thing as a clearly configured value. We document those interpretations and avoid treating a simple text difference between two payloads as a reliable description of the network change.
Design transaction and recovery behaviour
Where supported, datastore and commit features can help control a device-level change. Their prerequisites and limitations are checked, including how a session failure or timeout is handled. We do not assume that a successful transaction on one device provides an all-or-nothing result across a multi-device workflow.
Ambiguous responses require read-back and reconciliation before retrying. A connection may fail after the device accepted the change. The recovery process identifies the current state and the safe next action, rather than blindly repeating a write or assuming that the original setup remains intact.
Validate operational results
After a setup action, we retrieve relevant state and test the service condition the change was intended to achieve. A schema-valid payload and successful response do not prove that a route, authentication path or app connection is working. Acceptance combines interface evidence with an appropriate network-level check.
Read-only integrations also need validation. We compare chosen values with known device state, check units and identifiers, and test how missing or unsupported data is reported. A collection script should fail visibly when its assumptions no longer hold instead of producing an apparently complete but misleading report.
Deliver a maintainable interface integration
The handover includes supported models, tested versions, payload examples, access needs and failure handling. Dependencies and client libraries are recorded, with a process for assessing device upgrades against the integration. Sensitive values are kept out of ordinary logs and documentation.
MCI can use NETCONF and RESTCONF within network change automation or a focused information-gathering task. The result is a controlled use of structured Cisco interfaces, retaining the approvals, platform checks and recovery planning that production networking requires regardless of how setup is delivered.
Talk to a specialist
Need a specialist view?
Tell us what is affected, what changed and what your team has already checked. A short outline is enough to start.
+44 203 196 6566Choose option 1
sales@proxar.co.ukUK-wide service.
Most of our engineers are based in Kent, with a focus on London, Sussex, Essex and Berkshire.
Existing customers should use their agreed support and escalation channels. This form is for service enquiries, not a monitored emergency ticket.
Tell us what you need.
A short outline is enough. Please do not include passwords or sensitive network details.
Thank you. Your enquiry has been submitted.
Please check your name, email and message, then try again.
Your form session expired. Please try again.
Please wait a minute before sending another enquiry.
We could not submit your enquiry. Please call or email us instead.